Discount Gold and Silver Trading

American Survival Newsletter:
Combining the World of Finance, Health & Politics

American Gold

A weekly newsletter brought to you by
Discount Gold & Silver 800-375-4188
Edited by Alfred Adask
Friday, March 15th, A.D. 2013

Between Friday, March 8th and Friday, March 15th, the bid prices for:

Gold rose 0.9 % from $1,579.20 to $1,592.90
Silver fell 0.8 % from $29.00 to $28.77
Platinum fell 0.6 % from $1,599 to $1,589
Palladium fell 1.0 % from $781 to $773
DJIA rose 0.8 % from 14,397.07 to 14,514.11
NASDAQ rose 0.1 % from 3,244.37 to 3,249.07
NYSE rose 0.7 % from 9,054.44 to 9,116.68
US Dollar Index fell 0.7 % from 82.73 to 82.15
Crude Oil rose 1.7 % from $91.87 to $93.45

"Only buy something that you'd be perfectly happy to hold
if the market shut down for 10 years."—Warren Buffett

“If the market shut down for 10 years, what investment would you
dare to hold—other than gold?”—Alfred Adask

Good Americans Distrust Government—And they are the Majority

by Alfred Adask

I postulate that being a good American means living in harmony with the spirit of The Constitution of the United States.  If that’s true, should we ever trust government? 

Absolutely not.

The reason we have three, separate and independent branches of government (Legislative, Executive and Judicial) is to keep those governmental branches fighting among themselves and thereby prevent the emergence of a single, dictatorial government that worked for its own interests rather than those of the people.  The mandate for three branches of government (separation of powers) is evidence that the Founders didn’t trust the federal government.

The reason we have “checks and balances” in the Constitution is to protect the people from the federal government.  The Founders didn’t trust the feds

The reason we have the 1st Amendment right to free speech is to allow us to expose government corruption. 

According to the “Preamble to the Bill of Rights,” the reason we have the entire Bill of Rights (including the 2nd Amendment) is to prevent “misconstruction or abuse” of the powers granted under the Constitution to the officers, officials and employees of the federal government.

Insofar as the Constitution was intended to allow for only a “limited” government, that Constitution was intended to protect against government’s inevitable and insatiable appetite for more power, more taxes and less freedom.  The Founders didn’t trust the federal government.

In fact, it can be argued that the genius of our Constitution is that it’s the world’s only “anti-government” Constitution; that its fundament purpose was not to empower, but rather to restrict, government.  The Founders recognized that, inevitably, there must be a federal government (a “necessary evil”)—but they never trusted that government and therefore enshrined their distrust in the limits imposed by the Constitution.

The Founders agreed with George Washington, who said, “Government, like fire, is a dangerous servant or a fearful master.”  I.e., the best government you’ll ever get is a “dangerous servant”.  If you are ever fool enough to trust that “dangerous servant,” you can expect it to quickly morph into a “fearful master”—a dictatorship and police state.

Thus, if being a “good American” means living in harmony with the spirit of the Constitution, being a “good American” necessarily means distrusting the government.

And, as you’ll read, the vast majority—73%—of all Americans implicitly agree in that they don’t trust the government.  Today, only one American in four is sufficiently ignorant, naïve or treasonous to trust the government.

But, before we explore the statistics, let’s consider some evidence that distrust of government is reasonable, rational and warranted.


The New York Times reports (“Obama’s Backers Seek Big Donors to Press Agenda”) that,
“President Obama’s political team is fanning out across the country in pursuit of an ambitious goal: raising $50 million to convert his re-election campaign organization into a powerhouse national advocacy network, a sum that would rank the new group as one of Washington’s biggest lobbying operations.”
I.e., the President—whose job as highest officer in the Executive Branch of government is to execute the laws enacted by Congress—seeks to raise $50 million so he can influence or even control legislation

But under our Constitution, we have three branches of government (Legislative, Executive, and Judicial) whose fundamental functions are supposed to be exclusive to each branch and beyond the legitimate powers of the other two branches.  Nevertheless, President Obama seeks to raise $50 million so he can influence legislation and arguably bribe congressmen and senators. 

Thus, it appears that, just like George W. Bush, President Obama also regards the Constitution as nothing but a “g.d. piece of paper”.  It’s not enough to be the Chief Executive; Obama also wants to be the chief Legislator.  The S.O.B. is attempting to subvert the form of government declared in our Constitution.  As such, he is engaged in treason.
“But the rebooted [presidential reelection] campaign, known as Organizing for Action has plunged the president and his aides into a campaign finance limbo with few clear rules, ample potential for influence-peddling, and no real precedent in national politics.”
President Obama seeks to influence Congress in a way that is outside the law and open to whatever influence or control Obama can muster.

“In private meetings and phone calls, Mr. Obama’s aides have made clear that the new organization will rely heavily on a small number of deep-pocketed donors. . . . At least half of the group’s budget will come from a select group of donors who will each contribute or raise $500,000 or more.”

Average Americans need not apply.  Obama will seek donations primarily from a few rich people. 

But the rich seldom become rich by giving their money away without getting something in return. We can therefor presume that the rich will trade their cash quid pro quo for influence.  Whatever the rich want, Obama will seek to deliver.
“Unlike a presidential campaign, Organizing for Action has been set up as a tax-exempt “social welfare group.” That means it is not bound by federal contribution limits, laws that bar White House officials from soliciting contributions, or the stringent reporting requirements for campaigns. In their place, the new group will self-regulate.”
President Obama seeks to turn his reelection campaign organization into a lobbying group that will be largely above the law, unaccountable to the American people, and subject only to whatever regulations it seeks to impose on itself.

Do you believe that such an unaccountable lobbying organization will work for the best interests of the American people or for the best interests of major corporations and the government, itself? 

Does Obama’s proposal inspire you to trust the government? 


The reason anyone votes for a particular candidate is that we think that candidate has a system of values that’s much like our own.  You might vote for the Democrat because you think his personal system of values is most like yours; I might vote for the Republican because I think his system of values is most like mine.  I presume that since my candidate (or political party) has a system of values most like my own, then, when a new bill is proposed in Congress, my candidate will read that bill and decide to support, reject or amend it pretty much as I would if I were sitting in Congress. 

You operate under the same presumption.  You believe your candidate has a system of values so much like your own that you can expect him to vote as you would vote on proposed legislation.

The problem is that Congress no longer reads the bills that they vote for or against.  It’s common knowledge that no Congressman or Senator read the original “Patriot Act,” the “National Defense Authorization Act” or “Obamacare” before they voted to enact those bills.  Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi shamelessly illustrated the congressional disinclination to read bills before they voted on them when she told Congress, “But we have to pass the [Obamacare] bill so that you can find out what’s in it . . . .”  And the jackasses in Congress (that includes your favorite candidate and mine), voted for the 2,800-page Obamacare bill without even having seen it.

Given that Congress no longer reads or even writes most of our legislation, what difference does it make if your favorite Congressman has a system of values just like yours?  If they don’t read the bills, their system of values is irrelevant.  You could just as easily elect a child molester, serial killer or chimpanzee to Congress as a man who appears to embrace your system of values.  If none of them will read the proposed legislation, what difference does their personal system of values make?

Which brings us to the next question:  If Congressmen don’t read the proposed bills, how do they know which bills to vote for or against? 

A:  Someone tells them

That “someone” may be the Speaker of the House, President of the Senate, minority “whip”—or some lobbyist.  But whoever tells your favorite congressman or mine how to vote, it’s not you or me.   More importantly, whoever tells our congressmen how to vote, that’s who our congressmen truly represent.  They don’t represent you or me; they represent whoever tells them how to vote.

Finally, we elect people to the Legislative branch of government for the purpose of “legislating” new laws.  The process of legislation goes something like this:  A congressman or senator sees a problem in our society or economy and believes that problem can be mitigated or eliminated by enacting a new law.  That legislator drafts a proposed law and then seeks other legislators to support his proposal.  Those other legislators read the proposed law and accept it, reject it, or insist on certain changes or additions.  A certain amount of bargaining and horse-trading takes place and then a final bill is submitted to the Congress at large to vote for or against.

But today, given that Congress doesn’t read or write most of the laws they enact, congressmen no longer function as legislators.  Instead, they focus as law “brokers”.  Lobbyist approach congressmen with proposed legislation that the lobbyists have already drafted.  Lobbyists offer congressmen bribes (a/k/a “political campaign contributions”) to “broker” the proposed laws.  If the money is right, the congressman agrees to broker the proposed law—without even reading that proposal

It’s all about the money.

That description is not true in every case, but it’s true in a lot of cases, probably most cases.

Your congressman is for sale to the highest bidder.  He is a law broker and a treasonous whore.

Some congressmen are worse than others, but you’d be hard-pressed to find five men or women in the Congress (none in the Senate) who aren’t willing to betray this nation’s best interests if the money is right.  They’ve abandoned their tedious role as legislators to embrace the more profit role as law brokers.  In doing so, they’ve become laughing, grinning, treasonous whores.

Does that description inspire your trust for government?


You’d be hard-pressed to find anyone who’s worked closely with our local, state and federal courts who doesn’t believe them to be corrupt, avaricious and self-serving. 

The courts are famous for unilaterally amending the Constitution with “judge-made” law.  However, when it comes to issuing treasonous decisions, the Supreme Court may have topped itself with Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, 558 U.S. 310 (A.D.2010), wherein the Court held that the First Amendment prohibited the government from restricting independent political expenditures by corporations and unions

The Moral Lowground described that case as follows:
“Citizens United freed corporations, unions and other monied interests . . . to spend unlimited amounts of money to influence the outcome of American elections . . . effectively turning back the clock to the era of 19th century robber barons and wild capitalism.

“The Supreme Court’s perversely twisted logic boiled down to this: under the First Amendment, corporations are people and money is free speech.  [Because] deep-pocketed corporations [will] drown out the voices of ordinary citizens simply by virtue of their newly-endowed unlimited spending powers, Citizens United effectively gives corporations rights that ordinary citizens do not enjoy.

In his dissent, Justice John Paul Stevens wrote that “the Court’s ruling threatens to undermine the integrity of elected institutions across the nation. It will undoubtedly cripple the ability of ordinary citizens, Congress, and the states to adopt even limited measures to protect against corporate domination of the electoral process.”
The simple truth is that corporations are legal fictions; they’re not “people” and therefore not entitled to the rights of “people”.   They can’t speak and therefore have no freedom of speech.  The first Amendment was never intended to protect the “speech” of corporations.  Nevertheless, the Supreme Court has ruled that corporations are “people” and entitled to spend as much money as they like in support of whatever candidates or issues are in the corporation’s interests.

But as the Moral Lowground concluded,
“Historians may very well look back at Citizens United as . . . one of the pivotal events in the emergence of what can only be described as the coming corporatocracy; a time when “We the People” metastasized into “We the Corporations,” when “of the People, by the People, for the People” got twisted into “of the Corporations, by the Corporations, for the Corporations.”
“Corporatocracy” sounds very much like fascism.  Does that prediction of a growing “corporatocracy” inspire your trust in the federal courts and/or the federal government?

•  When you consider the blatant violations of the Constitution committed by the Legislative, Executive and Judicial branches, there’s little reason to trust the government and much reason to fear the government.

Unfortunately, those who have such fears and distrust feel themselves to be in a minority and so badly outnumbered that they’re afraid to express their concerns. 

But as a recent study by the Pew Research Center discovered, those who fear and distrust our government are not a minority of “extremists”.

Instead, they comprise the majority of Americans

•  Here are excerpts from a transcript of a recent PBS Newshour radio program where Judy Woodruff interviewed Andy Kohut, director of the Pew Research Center:
“Judy Woodruff: A new survey from the Pew Research Center finds the nation increasingly distrustful of the federal government. The findings show that about one-quarter of Americans trust government to do the right thing always or most of the time.  A whopping 73 percent don't.

“So, Andy, you found that a majority think the federal government actually threatens their personal rights.

“Andrew Kohut:  Yes—for the first time since we have been asking this question, we have a majority, 53 percent, saying that they feel their rights are personally threatened by the government. . . . Gun control is part of their worries. I think you go back to Obamacare, many people complaining the government is telling me that I have to buy health insurance. They don't have the right to do this. . . . distrust in government has been endemic since the end of the 1960s  . . .  many surveys show support for Congress stands around 10 percent, an incredible number for a representative democracy and one that signals enormous disaffection.

“Three-quarters of US citizens don't trust the US government and some 90 percent don't trust Congress.

“But bear [those figures] in mind when watching or reading the mainstream media to get a sense of just how disconnected modern political policy is from the actuality of voter sentiment.”
In other words, government and the mainstream media would have us believe that virtually only a handful of “extremists” distrust or even fear the “beneficent” federal government when, in fact, those “extremists” constitute a majority of the American people.

It’s important that the “extremists” know that they are not an isolated minority, but instead a majority. As the majority, they have less to fear from government and more confidence in their ability to stand up, resist tyranny, and be supported by their neighbors.

•  If any other nation (say, China) inspired fear in 53% of its people, and distrust in 75%, we’d say that nation was at least a police state and probably headed for serious internal conflicts.

Could it be any different for the U.S.?

Be sure to listen to Financial Survival radio program live at and Short-wave radio 7.490 AND 9.880Mhz M-F 4:00PM ET. We broadcast in cities of Spokane KTAC 93.0 5-6pm Eastern, Metairie WVOG 600AM 3-4PM Eastern and Dallas KXBD 1480AM 4-5PM Eastern.

Discount Gold & Silver Trading Co. provides all forms of precious metals including gold, silver platinum and palladium whether you are buying or selling. Our inventory includes but not limited to the American Gold, Silver, Platinum Eagle and numismatic products including rare, investment and circulated coins. Silver dollars, silver bars, rounds are on hand for the silver investor. Foreign gold is also available. Call for information regarding your precious metal gold and silver IRA. Call 1-800-375-4188 or visit the Web site at or email us at:


Self Sufficiency

22 Things to Do Around Your Survivalist Homestead When It's Cloudy and You Don't Have Enough Solar Power to Surf the Internet

We had an elongated "monsoon" season this year. It rained about 4 weeks longer than usual. And it stayed cloudy most of that time. This led to precious little time available to run the Internet modem, since the batteries weren't getting a direct sunlight charge during this rainy spell. So we had to find things to do other than surf! 

1. Play cards
2. Scrape the burnt food from the kitchen wood stove top
3. Read a book
4. Increase the winter woodpile
5. Pump water into the holding tank from the well
6. Butcher a chicken for dinner
7. Collect juniper berries
8. Paint the wood trim
9. Bake an extra loaf of bread
10. Bring the extra loaf of bread to a neighbor
11. Take the dog on a hike
12. Take a luxurious bath
13. Write another chapter in your novel
14. Make whoopee
15. Dust behind the pictures
16. Mend socks
17. Make a kitchen planter box for herbs
18. Decide what you want to plant in next year's garden
19. Daydream
20. Sunbathe
21. Air out the pillows and blankets

22. You know what – some times I just like to spend time with my husband and our son, talking about the day, talking about current events or the latest upgrade for Linux – not text messaging, not talking in quick spurts on a cell phone, not emailing each other... talking face to face. Sometimes we forget what time it is and wind up talking late into the night. Sometimes in the middle of a conversation we decide to cook up something unusual (sautéed ground chicken meat marinated in ginger, mustard, sugar, leeks and vinegar this week) and have a feed.

Truth is, there's a lot you can do besides going to the mall or watching TV or playing video games on a cloudy day. Maybe I'll be lucky and it will be cloudy tomorrow.

From the authors of Surviving Survivalism – How to Avoid Survivalism Culture Shock, available at


Scientific Studies
by Wendy Wilson, Herbalist

Would you consider modern man to be smart? The Thinker statue attempts to depict man's inquiring mind. What was the inspiration behind this statue of a man sitting and pondering life? Was it how could the little ant carry fifty times its own body weight? Or was it how to convince the masses that it was not a more intelligent Creator who made the earth and everything in it but it was a bunch of nothing that came together and "BANG" the universe, the earth, animals, and man existed. Modern man puts a lot of faith in the fields of science. The word "ology" is a suffix that indicates a field of study such as biology (study of living things).   Did you know we have 633 studies with "ology" at the end of each title? Over the last 100 years the range and scope of scientific endeavors has expanded exponentially. We have the study of interaction of life in the environment (bioecology), the scientific study of thunder (brontology) and the study of books (bibliology). Yet on a worldwide scale we have been unable to solve hunger, war and many of the major diseases so common today that they've become an epidemic. Why do such things elude the intelligence of modern man?


A friend of mine passed me a link to a site where a DC airport ticket agent described some of the encounters he had with the folks on Capitol Hill. It is funny and criminal at the same time When you read through you see what kind of product the US public schools produce. And how can children learn anything at school when there is so much violence and corruption there. People all over the country ask how we can make our schools safe. How can we make our streets safe? How can we make our country safe and prosperous again? That's easy. Put God back into the church, schools, government, and military. The moment the church allowed God to be removed is when the decline started. Like a frog plopped into a pot of cool water and the burner turned on under the pot. Slowly the water was heated but the frog didn't notice until the water was near a rolling boil. We are in hot water when we have atheists suing Army Chaplains for praying and we have complete idiots on Capitol Hill that don't know Orlando Florida is not on the coast. We have a few hundred politicians telling millions of Americans what they can and can't do.


We don't need 633 fields of science to tell us what the problem is. Man has strayed off course. We've taken our virtual reality world to new heights and we believe lies and deny truth. We have people getting degrees in Emetology (study of vomiting), Parthenology (study of virgins) and Gigantology (study of giants). In reality the world is studying and practicing Hamarthiology (study of sin). 


The American Cancer Society was founded in 1913. So, it's been 100 years and we've managed to not find a cure for cancer but have managed to develop treatments with 100% mortality for cancer patients. The logo for the American Cancer Society is the sword of hope. When you ask them why the sword of hope they will tell you that "it represents their contemporary, powerful and cohesive entity." This is a corporate entity designed to make money. Within 20 years of its inception the organization was making millions. Today it is in the billions. They won't make billions if cancer is eradicated. See my report on Mortality Treatments. You can read about the growth of American Cancer Society here Same thing with the American Heart Association making billions on the illusion of health and heart drugs for life And again in the 1940's with the American Diabetic Association (millions of dollars to keep the disease going) . Are you seeing a pattern here?


We can't forget the cherry on top of this scientific pastry. Medical insurance kicked in around the 1930's  However in the 1800's and early 1900's folks avoided the hospitals and stayed home to get well. Can't have that, there isn't any money in it for the petrochemical companies, the CEO's who run them and the physicians that push the stuff. In the 1920's medical advances, from the identification of in­fectious agents to the development of antitoxins, vaccines, and new medical technologies such as X-ray radiography and blood pressure meters came into play. The innovation and marketing transformed the public image of medicine, and people began to place more trust in medical science and its institutions. More science expanding exponentially created more dependency.


Modern science has become so advanced that we still have hunger, war and disease epidemics BUT they are more controlled by a Godless government. If we want to be healthier, safer and better we must honor God. I have no doubt that if we put prayer back into our schools and stop killing children via abortions that God's hand of protection will protect our inheritance (children). If we put God back into the pulpits we will be able to put God back into government, military and the financial markets. To do that, we need to pray for real men of God to be put in the pulpits and remove the hirelings (wolves). The reality is ministers need to be salt not sugar. Make that a daily prayer.


So, as long as God says we are to be here so it shall be. We need to make good use of our time because none of us is guaranteed another day on this earth. Ask yourself if you died are you sure you would go to heaven? It is a question worth asking. Are you sure your name is written in the Lord's Book of Remembrance? Mind the time, it grows short. Don't waste anytime getting prepared. If you already have your self defense ammo, that's great. What about your immune system ammo? You will eventually need back-up medicine and with a long shelf life. Call Apothecary Herbs for natural products with a ten-year shelf life and get their free product catalog 866-229-3663, International 704-885-0277 online, where your healthcare options just became endless.

Herbalist Wendy Wilson on Herb Talk Live

Saturday morning show:
7 am EST on GCN
4/13/13 Natural vision expert John Monroe

Weekday show:
7 pm EST on AVR
3/14/13 Margaret Pressler author of Cheat the Clock
3/19/13 Dr. Rebecca Carley
4/11/13 Natural Vision Expert John Monroe
Shortwave show 8 pm EST WWCR 4840

Go to Herb Talk Live & Radio Archive area for network link access and past shows to download and share. For Android users you can download a FREE app for Herb Talk Live on GCN. See the download link under radio archives at top of page at

What's Ailing America?
The Great & Powerful Oz Continues to Hoodwink the Public

by Rebecca Carley, MD

In my 20th newsletter, I discussed the "Wizard of Oz" and how this shill for big pharma is being used to pretend that main stream medicine embraces "natural" solutions, and even more ridiculous that medical doctors learn anything about nutrition or "alternative" therapies when they are training.  He is being used to get Americans (especially women) to trust him so that when he inserts his disinfo amongst the truth he does tell, people will lap it up. You can find one of his biographies at   I found it very interesting that he "took time off from medical school to serve in the Turkish army in order to retain his dual citizenship".  I find it astounding that he just "happens" to have the last name of "Oz".  It is obvious that this name is an inside joke regarding his present job of "steering the herd" to trust mainstream medicine.  (The good news?  The fraud that is the wizard is being realized check out .)

The inspiration for this week's newsletter was a show that the Wizard did on Alzheimer's Disease that aired on 3/8/13. On this show, Oz had as his guest Dr. Neal Barnard, author of the book "Power Foods for the Brain".  This is a perfect example of how the propaganda machine works. 

My grandmother died of Alzheimer's disease.  I lived with her when I was in high school; I watched her cook tomato sauce in aluminum pots, cover dishes with this acidic sauce with aluminum foil (which developed holes in it rather quickly).  Because what I had watched my grandmother go through, I paid very close attention when we learned about Alzheimer's disease in medical school.  In my textbook "Harrison's Principles of Internal medicine" (10th edition, (c) 1983), it states on page 2120 what the distinctive pathological findings of Alzheimers include:  1.  Microscopic deposits of fragmented axons, dendrites, and gial fibrils called neuritic plaques.  These neuritic plaques are known to contain amyloid – a glycoprotein whose protein compotent  is apparently related to the immunoglobulin IgG; 2.  Fibrillary changes in nerve cells;  3.  ALUMINUM within the neurofibrillary tangles seen on microscopic evaluation. Of course, this caught my attention BIGTIME, since I had watched my grandmother being exposed to aluminum and then develop Alzheimer's down the pike.  (Also on page 2120 it is mentioned that the changes found in Alzheimer's have been "produced in a number of ways in experimental animals". The "number of ways" are not mentioned. However, on page 2119 of the same edition of Harrison's it states that "diphtheria toxin selectively attacks the myelin sheath of peripheral nerves" .)

"Neuronal origin of a cerebral amyloid neurofibrillary tangles of Alzheimer's Disease contain the same protein as the amyloid of plaque cores and blood vessels"  published in 1985 (go to ) is very important.  YOU WILL SEE THAT ALUMINUM SILICATE IS DESCRIBED AS THE NON-PROTEIN COMPONENT OF THE AMYLOID WHICH FORMS A BASIS FOR THE DEPOSITION OF THE AMYLOID.  

So obviously Aluminum is highly involved in causing Alzheimer's, as is mercury (both of which are in flu and pneumonia vaccines given to the elderly every year).  If you want to see how mercury kills nerve cells, please go to , and watch how neurons exposed to mercury shrivel up and die (note that the neurons used in this experiment were snail neurons, which don't have a myelin sheath; the myelin sheath is what is attacked in Autism).

Getting back to Dr. Oz and his guest Dr. Barnard.  To begin with, a storyline is created to give Dr. Barnard credibility.  It is stated that "Dr. Barnard  really wants to help people because several members of his family contracted Alzheimer's disease". So we are to beLIEve that he has an altruistic motive for his information (even though the attacks on doctors who speak the truth are evidence that the mainstream media will never tell the people the truth as to why people are getting all these diseases). Thus, this is an obvious ploy to get the attention of the audience, who beLIEve that his "heart is in the right place".  Of course, were that true, he would be warning listeners about the dangers of Alzheimers just from the exposures to mercury and aluminum in the vaccines.  Not to mention that the aluminum in vaccines is also responsible for the vaccine induced allergy and anaphylaxis, as I reported in my 2nd newsletter on that subject.  I reported that the NATO Life Sciences book entitled "Immunological Adjuvantsand Vaccines".   reveals that it is known that the aluminumwhich is put into vaccines as an adjuvant (to heighten antibody production) causes production of IgE the antibody of allergy and anaphylactic shock   This shocking admission comes in this book after the statement on page 6 that aluminum "was introduced in 1926, before strict control by regulatory authorities was practiced; whether it would be allowed by regulatory authorities today is far from certain".  In other words, were it known in 1926 how deleterious the aluminum in vaccines is to the human body, it would never have been allowed; however, now that it IS known how deleterious it is, nothing will be done to stop its use.  On page 37 of this NATO book, it states that studies demonstrate that "aluminum causes stimulation of the production of anaphylactic antibody (IgE) in the mouse", and that "the effect of aluminum on the IgE response in humans does not appear to have been investigated".  Thus, it is no surprise that the link of Aluminum and mercury to Alzheimer's is being ignored even though aluminum deposits are obviously the base on which the dead neurons killed by mercury tangle themselves.

So what does Dr. Barnard warn Dr. Ozs' listeners are dangerous elements that can cause Alzheimer's?  Iron, copper and zinc. Mostly, he blames food and cookware (especially cast iron and copper based cookware) for an overdose of these elements.  The Wizard of Oz is there to give his approval of this disinfo, and thus the great and powerful creates big pharma's "truth".  This is also being promoted by "scientific" studies, such as the 2011 article out of Cold Spring Harbor which can be found at  This is a perfect example of how they use big words to confuse even the majority of doctos who may read this article, as well as "forgetting" to mention that aluminum is the base to which the dead neurons in the form of "neurofibrillary tangles" adhere.

To show the layers of disinfo, one of my clients sent me a newsletter from William Kelley Eidem author of The Doctor Who Cures Cancer (since it is illegal to use the word "cure" in regards to cancer, this is a huge red flag).  He promotes Dr. Barnard, while at the same time stating that the first thing wrong was his criticism of saturated fats as being injurious to the brain. The opposite is true - not enough saturated fat is injurious to the brain.   (So why promote him?)

"Dr. Bernard also "might have misidentified" some of the culprits in Alzheimer's, namely iron, copper and zinc. This mistake was made because those three minerals are found in brain plaque. Eidem claims it is not the minerals that hurt your brain, it's the fibrin (fibrin being an insoluble protein formed during blood clotting, which has NOTHING to do with amyloid).  Eidem proposes that fibrin is preventing these 3 minerals from reaching their preferred destination.   ANOTHER LAYER OF DISINFO TO CAUSE CONFUSION

If you need help in reversing your disease with natural therapies. please go to learn how Dr. Carley does consults.  (Note that Alzheimers can be reversed as long as there is family available to give the person their remedies).  Also, listen to "What's Ailing America? on on Sun from 4-6 PM EST. You can also access many archives of shows Dr. Carley has done over the last few years at .

The information contained herein is not designed to diagnosis, treat, prevent or cure disease. Seek medical advice from a lincensed medical physician (if you dare) before using any product or therapy.

To unsubscribe to this email, reply and put "Unsubscribe" in the subject line.

Copyright 2012-13 Discount Gold & Silver Trading All rights reserved

Discount Gold and Silver Trading, PO Box 507, Port Matilda, PA 16870 • 1-800-375-4188