Discount Gold and Silver Trading

American Survival Newsletter:
Combining the World of Finance, Health & Politics

American Gold

A weekly newsletter brought to you by
Discount Gold & Silver 800-375-4188
Edited by Alfred Adask
Friday, June 14th, A.D. 2013

Between Friday, June 7th, and Friday, June 14th, the bid prices for:

Gold rose 0.5 % from $1,384.60 to $1,391.50
Silver rose 1.8 % from $21.69 to $22.08
Platinum fell 3.7 % from $1,501 to $1,445
Palladium fell 3.3 % from $755 to $730
DJIA fell 1.1 % from 15,248.12 to 15,070.18
NASDAQ fell 1.3 % from 3,469.22 to 3,423.56
NYSE fell 0.9 % from 9,355.40 to 9,263.69
US Dollar Index fell 1.3 % from 81.67 to 80.62
Crude Oil rose 1.7 % from $96.22 to $97.88

"Only buy something that you'd be perfectly happy to hold
if the market shut down for 10 years."—Warren Buffett

“If the market shut down for 10 years, what investment would you
dare to hold—other than gold?”—Alfred Adask

Evolution vs. Creationism—
Comparing Consequences

by Alfred Adask

I’ve recently made contact with several people with whom I went to high school. I haven’t seen or talked to any of them in most of 50 years. Hard to believe. 50 years?! (How th’ hell did that happen?!)

One of them (John S.) actually took the time to read a couple of my blog entries. I was delighted.

John then sent an email asking for my opinion on an article about a particular anthropologist. I started to read the article—and I’d like to have responded to the contents of that article—but I was quickly diverted by descriptions of the anthropologist’s dedication to Darwin’s theory of Evolution.

Well, I felt compelled to explain my notions on Evolution and Creationism to John. It wasn’t the subject matter he’d asked for, but he did ask for my opinion on “something”. In doing so, he provided me with a bit of a “soapbox”. For me, that’s an almost irresistible temptation. (In fact, when it comes to soapboxes, I’m kinda like Will Rogers. I never met a soapbox that I didn’t like. I have a little of Archimedes in me, too: “Give me a soapbox big enough and a place to stand, and I will move the world.)

In any case, once I got rolling, I wound up writing over 2,500 words on my notions concerning Evolution and Creationism. That’s too many words to present to just one man by email. The resulting text is not about gold, silver, or economics.  It’s not about “financial survival”.  But it is about your survival as a man, woman, community or nation, so I’m reposting here:

•  Mr. Chagnon (the anthropologist in the article John provided) appears to subscribe to Darwin's theory of evolution.

I do not. I’m a “creationist”.  

Don't snicker.  

When it comes to choosing between the Theory of Evolution and the Theory of Creationism, if you judge each theory by its consequences, Creationism is actually the most rational choice.

I recognize the seemingly powerful logic behind Evolution, but I also recognize its fundamental flaw.  "Evolution" essentially means "change". I.e., "A" changes or evolves into "B". Then "B" changes or evolves into "C," and so on. That makes enormous sense except for one fundamental question: Where'd you get the original "A" that was subsequently changed or evolved?

Evolution can explain how “A” changes, but it can't explain how the original “A” came to exist. Evolution can’t explain the "creation" of “A”.

• Virtually all life relies on DNA. So far as I know, DNA can't exist outside of a cellular structure. This implies that the first strand of DNA could not have existed and survived without a cellular wall that protected the DNA. But the cellular wall can’t exist except as a consequence and product of some initial DNA.  So we are left with chicken/egg-shell question—which came first? The DNA or the cell wall?

I'm sure none of this is news to you, John.

I’d expect any evolutionist worth his salt to point out that while Evolution can explain how "A" changed to "B"—but can't explain how "A" came to exist in the first place—Creationism is every bit as flawed.

While Creationism can explain that "A" was created by God, it does not explain where God came from.  As every evolutionist wants to know, who or what created God?  If Creationists can’t explain how God came to be, why should evolutionists be bound to explain how “A” came to be?  Both theories postulate but cannot prove that some thing (“A”) or some God originally existed. Neither theory can prove their fundamental postulate.

Thus, Evolution can’t explain the creation of life.

But, Creationism can’t explain the creation of God.

Neither theory can convincingly explain the original act of creation. Both theories’ primary postulates are beyond our capacity to test and prove.

We believe in one theory or the other as an act of faith.

More, insofar as both theories can't be proved, belief in either theory is a matter of choice.

• However, if I can't prove which of the two fundamental theories is true, I can prove which of the two theories will have consequences that are most conducive (or most adverse) to my well-being. In other words, when it comes to believing in one theory or the other, what's in it for me?  Which of the two theories provides more positive benefits for me or even my fellow man?

The answer, hands down, is Creationism.

If you, and I and society choose to believe in Evolution, then we should consider the possibility that the primary distinction between ourselves and all other species may be our ability to create and use sophisticated weapons.  Insofar as evolution is based on survival of the fittest, it is necessarily conducive to violence.  If you want to mate with a particular female and you’re very strong, you can fight off your rivals.  Or, if you’re not so strong but you have a gun, you can simply kill them and still get the girl.

And why not? What intrinsic difference exists under the theory of Evolution that makes the murder of a man any more cause for concern that the killing (and subsequent roasting) of a chicken? The chicken is meat; we're meat—what's the problem with killing meat—any meat?

We can follow the logic of Evolution to justify a government killing another nation with nuclear weapons, or killing a large number of its own people to wipe out the government's creditors.  (If the creditors die, so does the national debt.)

When it comes to survival of the fittest, what's more important—survival of the people or survival of the government? I'll guarantee that the entity we call "government" views its own survival as far more important than the survival of its old-time creditors or the people at large.

So, why not kill ‘em all? Why not kill all those old farts who are now collecting So-So Security? If gov-co could cause the elderly to die at a younger age, the government's debt for SS would be hugely reduced. Unfunded liabilities for Medicare and Medicaid might disappear. Obamacare could even turn out to be affordable.

From an evolutionary point of view, it's just good economics to whack the old timers—as well as anyone else who is non-productive and (as Henry Kissinger once observed) a "useless eater".

From an evolutionary perspective, why should we subsidize all those non-productive, "useless eaters"? Why allow our gene pool to be polluted and even dominated by the DNA of misfits and morons? Why not kill 'em all?  Those arguments made perfect sense to Adolph Hitler.

Under Evolution, those arguments not only make sense but appear to be inescapable conclusions.  As individuals, or a people or even a nation, to the extent we believe in Evolution, we must inevitably believe in murder, mass murder and even genocide. Survival of the fittest. Dog eat dog. Violence.

• But, under Creationism, I see a different world view and an entirely different set of values.

The most important principle in the Bible is seen at Genesis 1:1—"In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth."  Most people read that line as a mere introduction to a fable—something like "Once upon a time, there was a beautiful fairy princess who was held captive by an evil witch."

But, in fact, Genesis 1:1 is a statement of legal title. Just as modern inventors can claim patents on whatever new invention they’ve created, and a writer can claim a copyright to whatever articles he's written, God is also entitled to legal title to whatever He has created.

Insofar as He created the "heavens and the earth," by virtue of that act of creation, he owns perfect title the entire universe and can do whatever he sees fit with His property. If the Bible is true, you, I, the earth and the sky are all property of the Good LORD.

The second most important principle in the Bible is seen at Genesis 1:26-28—"On the 6th day, God created man in His image and gave man dominion over the animals." In those two verses, the Bible explains the legal distinction between man and animals and lays the foundation for allowing the killing of chickens, goats and cows—but not men and women.  We are made in God's image; the chickens, goats and cows are not.

The consequence of Genesis 1:26-28 is seen in Genesis 9:6 which explains that, under God's law, we’re prohibited from murdering another man or woman precisely because that man or woman is "made in God's image". This principle has laid the foundation for the prohibition against murder in some or all of the western world for several thousand years.

I certainly don't argue that recognition that man is made in God's image has stopped murder. But, it has inhibited our tendency to kill each other.

I think that's a good thing. Therefore, I want people to view me as a "man made in God's image" as a matter of self-defense. So long as they see me as "made in God's image" (and understand what that means) they're less likely to kill me, assault me, rob me or even overtax me. Creationism provides me with that line of self-defense.

However, I see no such line of defense in the theory of Evolution. In a survival-of-the-fittest, dog-eat-dog world where I’m deemed to be a mere, evolved "animal," there’s no fundamental reason not to kill, assault or rob me other than (even at my advanced age) I might be armed and sufficiently accurate with a pistol to kill any young predator who views me as just an old, weakened animal fit to be slaughtered and/or exploited.

Evolution (survival of the fittest) favors the young and strong attacking the old or weak.  Creationism discourages such attacks.

• So far, my observations may sound silly to most, but the Powers That Be recognize and employ the underlying principles.

Every time the Hutus decide to chop the Tutsi's into chunks, they first declare the Tutsi's to be "animals". As animals, the Tutsi's have no more right to live than chickens, pigs or goats. Therefore, as "animals" every Tutsi—women, children, old men, non-combatants—can be slaughtered just like a nest of rats.  Kill 'em all, boys—they're just animals! Even primitive people understand that animals are not entitled to the same protections as men.

You can kill “animals” with abandon. But you can't easily murder “men” and “women”—even if they’re members of an adversarial tribe. (Odd, isn’t it? Even primitive people understand the importance of definitions. Define your adversary one way, and you can kill him. Define him another way, and you must respect his right to life.)

Of course, primitive people like the Hutu’s don't understand Genesis 1:26-28 and 9:6.  But they nevertheless know in their gut that it takes special "justification" to kill all of the members of some other tribe. That justification can be found in the belief that the other tribe is composed of "animals".

Evolution presumes all of us to be "animals".

As such, Evolution provides much of the justification needed to rob, rape or murder even innocent children. After all, they're just "animals"—right?

• Just a few years before you and I were born (which, as you know, John, isn’t really so long ago), Adolph Hitler's regime allegedly exterminated several million Jews.

But I'm told that before the camps were built or gas chambers used, Hitler first passed laws to declare the Jews to be "untermenschen" ("under-men"; subhumans; animals).  Once the Jews were legally degraded to the status of "animals," there was no more reason to not kill them than there was to avoid killing all of the babies, mothers and adult males in a nest of rats.

Thus, less than a century ago, a civilized nation recognized the need to pass laws that declared even Jews to be animals before that nation could begin to exterminate Jews.  This illustrates that even governments like Nazi Germany understand and respect the legitimacy of Creationism.  They had to pass laws to get around it.

Of course, Nazi Germany only needed those laws because the Bible—and the theory of Creationism—taught that even Jews are made in God's image and thus not subject to being arbitrarily murdered.

However, man's laws were passed to supersede God's law (that we are all made in God's image) and several million innocent men, women and children were therefore slaughtered.  What do you think Hitler was talking about when we referred to Germans as the "master race"?  What was the concept of "Aryan Superman" all about?  How 'bout racial purity and ethnic cleansing?  Those concepts are all about Evolution.  Under Evolution, fascism in general, the Nazi regime in particular and even the death camps are all logical consequences.

Under the theory of Evolution, since we’re all declared to be "animals," no such law might be needed. Government could kill the niggers, wetbacks, po' white trash and even dissidents with impunity. If we're all only animals and we're weaker than the government, then why not kill us? Survival of the fittest, right?

But, in fact, our government has already passed laws to expressly declare the people to be "animals".  As I've reported in a series of articles under the category "Man or Other Animals" and especially at, "Man or Other Animals" #1, the federal and state legislatures have defined the words "drug" and "medical devices" to apply only to "animals". The war on drugs—and the resulting police state and prison-industrial complex—are based on a definition of "drug" that presumes us all to be "animals". That "war" is being waged against you me and our neighbors, under the same pretext that allows the Hutu's to chop the Tutsi's into chunks and allowed Hitler to murder millions.

This is no small thing.  It's cause for great alarm.  The legal principles are in place to treat you, me and our families just like Hitler treated the Jews.

And it's not a recent development.  The earliest instance of American laws that define the people to be "animals" (as per Evolution and contrary to Creationism) that I've been able to find is section 6 of the A.D. 1906 Pure Food and Drug Act.  The same government that claims to be “here to help you” has been treating us like animals at law for over a century.

• But it wasn't always that way.  Here, within The United States of America, we started with a pair principles never before seen in the western world. Those principles are found in the second and third sentences of the "Declaration of Independence".  They are the basis for "American Exceptionalism".  

Those principles are:
1) "…all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness."
Note the references to "created" and "Creator". The Founders were declaring the existence of rights that were granted to men made (created) in God's image.  But no such rights accrued to "animals" including men who were evolved rather than "created" by God.  There are no unalienable Rights for evolved animal-men—only for men who are "created" rather than evolved.

There was no theory of evolution in A.D. 1776, but it's apparent that the “unalienable Rights” declared in the "Declaration" would only be available under a theory of Creationism, but not Evolution.  The Theory of Evolution is arguably an attack on the fundamental principles of the “Declaration of Independence” and thus an attack on the fundamental principles for “The United States of America”.

Second principle:
2) "That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among men…"
The Founders were telling us that they deemed the first and primary objective for all State governments to be to secure every God-given, unalienable Right to every man, woman and even unborn (but already "created") child—even if they were too young, ignorant, old or disabled to claim those God-given rights for themselves.

These two principles (that all "created" men are equally endowed with certain unalienable rights from God; and government's primary duty is to secure those God-given rights) comprise the spiritual foundation on which America was built.

Today, these principles are completely unappreciated. We've all heard the second sentence ("All men are created equal," etc.) repeatedly during our lives, but who has understood it? How many people recognize that sentence as the most radical statement in 2,000 years of western history?

Not many.

Why radical? Because, prior to the "Declaration of Independence" only one man in each western country was deemed to be the king or "sovereign". One king of France, one king of England, etc. One sovereign for each country. All others were subjects. One sovereign and millions of subjects.

Why? What made one man "sovereign" and all others subjects?

A: The king alone, enjoyed the "divine right of kings". The king, alone, received his rights from God. He became king/sovereign in a coronation ceremony in a church. He wasn't elected or appointed by some secular body. He became the one-and-only sovereign within his nation because he, and he alone, received his rights from God. All else were subjects because they did not get any rights directly from God.

So, when the "Declaration of Independence" came along in A.D. 1776 and declared that all men—not just one man per country, but all men—were each equally endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, it elevated all men from the status of "subjects" to the status of "sovereigns". Government (which always serves the sovereign(s)) became the people's "public servant" rather than master.

Under these spiritual principles, we lived within the "Land of the Free".

Why "free"? Because each of us was a sovereign rather than a subject. Even though we might be weak and in many ways "unfit," we were still each sovereign and thus entitled to government's protection rather than oppression.

There's no such proviso for our protection to be found in the theory of Evolution. I'm sure arguments to the contrary could be made and those arguments might be interesting, but they'd have no legal weight or authority. People like myself would be left to fight for our lives in a dog-eat-dog world dominated by the survival of the fittest. Might would make right. The world would be a violent, primitive, and frightening (much as it is today).

• On the other hand, if the world embraced the spiritual principles found in the "Declaration of Independence," people like me would still have a legitimate claim on "freedom" and "liberty”. Government would really be here to help me (a "sovereign") rather than exploit or oppress me. Under the principles seen in the "Declaration," government would be a public servant rather than a public master.  A police state would be legally and politically impossible. (Under the theory of Evolution, a police state is virtually inevitable.)

Of course, you can't really embrace the principles of the "Declaration" (that men are created by God and endowed as an attribute of their creation with certain unalienable Rights and governments' primary job is to secure those God-given rights) without first embracing the theory of Creationism.

If I'm not a man made (created) in God's image, I’m only an "animal" who has no standing to claim the God-given, unalienable Rights declared in the "Declaration". If I'm not a man made (created) in God's image, I'm just an animal who has no defense against a government that might like to jail me, assault me or even kill me. In an "evolutionary" world dominated by survival of the fittest, so long as those government thugs are more physically fit or better armed than I am, my survival is in a constant state of peril.

• So—lessee—if I choose to embrace the theory of Evolution, I will have increased the chances that I'll be jailed, assaulted or even killed by my own government. Genocide and thermonuclear war are completely rational choices under the theory of Evolution.

On the other hand, if I chose to embrace the theory of Creationism, I have a good chance to enjoy freedom, liberty, and a long life. Genocide and thermonuclear war could only be viewed as the acts or madmen or satanists.

Therefore, given that neither theory can be proven, which theory—and its consequences—makes more sense for me to embrace?

The answer is obvious.  Creationism.

(“By their fruits, ye shall know them,” hmm?)

The answer is also amusing in this regard: the theory of Evolution is advanced by a lot of scientists and intellectuals who are deemed to be extremely rational, logical, reasonable and intelligent. And yet, they advance a theory that just might get them, their families, maybe their nation, maybe even the world, killed.

How rational, logical and reasonable is it to advocate a theory (Evolution) that just might get us all killed?

I’m reminded of Romans 1:22: “Thinking themselves wise, they became fools . . . .”

Conversely, how stupid, ignorant and silly is it for people like myself to advocate another theory (Creationism) that might help us to not only survive but do so with some measure of dignity and security from governmental abuse?

• I choose to believe in Creationism. Not because of the logic of the theory, but because of the logic of that theory's consequences.

Evolution (which I can't prove) could get me killed.

Creationism (which I can't prove) might keep me alive.

Judging by its consequences, isn’t it dumber and even self-destructive to believe in Evolution?

Judging by its consequences, isn’t smarter to believe in Creationism?

Professing a belief in Creationism is not simply an act of faith or religious fanaticism.   Properly understood, the choice to believe in Creationism is an act of rational self-interest and self-defense.  Even atheists and anthropologists (if they have any common sense and want to survive) should advocate the Theory of Creationism.

Those who choose to believe the theory of Evolution over the theory of Creationism are as ignorant, short-sighted and self-destructively stupid as any German Jew in the 1930s who might've supported Hitler.  Such Jew might’ve been extraordinarily intelligent and nevertheless extremely dumb.

To believe in Evolution is to allow a reasonable, articulate psychopath to enter into your mind.  That “visitor” to your mind may talk as smoothly as President Obama—but it can still get you killed.

Be sure to listen to Financial Survival radio program live at and Short-wave radio 7.490 AND 9.880Mhz M-F 4:00PM ET. We broadcast in cities of Spokane KTAC 93.0 5-6pm Eastern, Metairie WVOG 600AM 3-4PM Eastern and Dallas KXBD 1480AM 4-5PM Eastern.

Discount Gold & Silver Trading Co. provides all forms of precious metals including gold, silver platinum and palladium whether you are buying or selling. Our inventory includes but not limited to the American Gold, Silver, Platinum Eagle and numismatic products including rare, investment and circulated coins. Silver dollars, silver bars, rounds are on hand for the silver investor. Foreign gold is also available. Call for information regarding your precious metal gold and silver IRA. Call 1-800-375-4188 or visit the Web site at or email us at:



The new bug bite
by Herbalist Wendy Wilson

We no longer need to go to the movies to witness weird science because it is happening in real time in our daily lives. In summer we are more concerned about those summertime nuisances such as poison ivy, sunburn, bee stings and bug bites. Who would have thought that the scientific medical industry would develop a new way of getting bit by bugs? What am I talking about? I am saying that there are new processes afoot in the vaccine industry. Let's take a look.


What in God's name has the FDA approved now? They have given the approval for Protein Sciences Corporation (PSC) to manufacture a new experimental vaccine to test on the public. You may be saying, aren't all vaccines experimental? True, but this is the first vaccine to be made with genetically-modified (GM) proteins from three (3) different flu strains and GM proteins from insect cells. The GM flu drug is called Flublok and we're told that this vaccine is "trivalent." What's that? It means it contains proteins from three different flu strains. Apparently Protein Sciences Corporation extracted cells from insects to harvest the baculovirus for the purpose of speeding up the production of the serum. Also included in this vaccine are cells of the fall armyworm (caterpillar) which are genetically altered to produce huge amounts of hemagglutinin. Why is the hemagglutinin important? It is a type of flu protein to allow the flu viruses to penetrate the body quickly. This, we are told, enables vaccine makers to skip the traditional and slow process of growing cultures on eggs to make vaccines. This new technology will allow for unprecedented amounts of a vaccine to be made increasing the profits of the drug companies.


No one really knows all of the side effects this new vaccine will bring. There is literature that comes with the vaccine with a section titled "Warnings and Precautions." The routine warnings for this drug are listed such as; allergic reactions, respiratory infections, headache, fatigue, rhinorrhea, myalgia and altered immuno-competence.  So, this vaccine can compromise your natural immune system, which could be permanent. It can disable you and give you muscle pain and tenderness (think fibromyalgia). And it can cause your brain sac fluid to leak into your sinuses and out your nose. You will also learn that two of the human guinea pigs in their test group died after being injected with the Flublok vaccine. However, Protein Sciences Corporation insists the vaccine is safe and 45% effective against not just two or three strains but "all strains of influenza." I for one do not plan to be part of their long-term test group.


The competition to come up with universal flu vaccines is fierce. Novartis has come out in November with the Flucelvax vaccine, which is made with dog kidney cells. Like Flublok, this vaccine also is made without traditional means. The new vaccine technology will empower the drug companies to manufacture any serum for any pandemic at the drop of Big Brother's hat. Swift production and rapid distribution is the name of the game in the vaccine industry. We are told that the Flucelvax vaccine contains no preservatives and is reported to be 83.3% effective. Side effects of Flucelvax were soreness and redness at the injection site, headache, fatigue, hives, high fever, severe weakness, seizure, bleeding, chills, joint and muscle pain, respiratory distress, swelling of the face, lips, tongue or throat. and


Have you noticed photos taken at vaccine and research facilities where the staff wears more than the standard hospital attire? They have hair bonnets, masks, face shields, rubber gloves, shoe covers and double-tied gowns. We're told it is to keep the vaccine process sterile and as free of pollutants as possible. Sure, or is it to protect the staff from dangerous and possibly deadly viral strains? Perhaps it is both. I would not want to inject dangerous or deadly pathogens into my blood.


Genetically engineered medicine is very widespread. Today the vaccines are just the tip of the iceberg. Mass production of GM medicine include; insulin, human growth hormones, infertility drugs, human blood serum and antibodies, hemophilic drugs and vaccines. Regarding vaccines we are told that the genetically engineered serums are superior because they are made quickly and are missing the infectious sequences of the disease to be able to deliver an immune benefit. However, genetic engineered human blood made from mice cells fused together to create antibodies does not set well with me. Blood transfusions of human blood are risky enough; but navigating the unknown of recombinant vaccines composed of multiple antigens from various animal and insect cells is way outside the realm of nature. Also recently there have been many reports of fraud within the medical and pharmaceutical industries exposing the corruption. How are we to know if we're being told all the truth about these new medical technologies and treatments? I hazard to conclude that we are not. These new drugs and vaccines are altering the DNA of human.

"The more corrupt the state, the more numerous the laws."
—Tacitus, 56 AD–117 AD

"A man who has never gone to school may steal a freight care; but if he has a university education, he may steal the whole railroad."
—Theodore Roosevelt

"Evil men and seducers shall wax worse and worse, deceiving and being deceived."
—II Timothy 3:13


Obamacare will topple the medical system and you will need another way to look after your health. If you've been preparing for the worst, don't forget to stock you immune system ammo. There is this saying that life is in the blood. You will want to protect it from deadly pathogens and GM substances. Eat organic foods and do your semi-annual organ cleanses (including the blood). Learn how to cleanse the blood, remove heavy metals, pharmaceutical and vaccine residues with powerful herbs. Call the experts in immune boosting and organ cleansing, call Apothecary Herbs 866-229-3663, International 704-885-0277, web site, where your healthcare options just became endless. If you do not have an herb Pandemic Kit with a ten (10) year shelf life you can pick one up Do it before the money system crashes.

Herbalist Wendy Wilson on Herb Talk Live

Saturday morning show:
7 am EST on GCN
6/8/13 Dr. Rebecca Carley

Weekday show:
7 pm EST on AVR
6/13/13 John Monroe natural vision expert
6/18/13 Dr. Rebecca Carley
6/27/13 Dr. Christine Horner to discuss natural way to deal with breast cancer gene.
Shortwave show 8 pm EST WWCR 4840

Go to Herb Talk Live & Radio Archive area for network link access and past shows to download and share. For Android users you can download a FREE app for Herb Talk Live on GCN. See the download link under radio archives at top of page.

MORE HERB SECRETS IN THE POWER HERBS e-BOOK. By popular demand The Power Herbse-book is available with symptom/herb reference guide, information on organ cleansing and how to make your own herbal tinctures plus a whole lot more. Go here and click on Books. You must have email to order and receive the e-book a PDF version of The Power Herb book for just $14.99. At this time, we do not offer this title in hard copy.

What's Ailing America?
A government genociding citizens terrorists

by Rebecca Carley, MD

We are now learning that the NSA is listening to all of our phone calls and reading our e-mails (on the tail of stories about how drones are also being used for surveillance).  Hero Bradley Manning's trial has commenced; his crime being that he leaked evidence of war crimes to Wikileaks.  Thus, when one reveals evidence of terrorism on behalf of agents of the government, that whistleblower is labeled a terrorist for doing so.  Now NSA leaker Edward Snowden is being hunted down for leaking evidence as to the extent that Americans are being spied on by their own government.  These brave whistleblowers have risked their lives and liberty to warn Americans about what is going on, as I have been warning the people for over 16 years that the medical mafia is creating disease with bioweapon vaccines and toxic drugs.  I continue to wait to see what it will take for the people to say "enough".  Apparently the self preservation instinct has been eradicated from the consciousness of Americans, who are being distracted with "entertainment".  This, while the evidence that the traitors in the district of criminals continue to pass laws which are destroying our health is mounting beyond comprehension.

Genetically modified crops (GMO's) continue to be unleashed on the US even though many countries in Europe have refused to allow these frankenfoods in their countries.  Not only are the traitors in DC allowing the poisoning of Americans with these dangerous "foods", the corrupt senate has gone so far as to vote no to labeling GMO crops: Be sure to scroll down to the bottom of the article to learn which of your "representatives" has voted that you have no right to know what you are feeding your family.  You will see that the alleged "aisle" that they usually use as an excuse for their treason does not hold true in this vote; both democrats and republicans voted not to allow their constituents to know what foods they are eating that can alter their very genetic structure (so if you are smart enough not to allow yourself to be injected with foreign DNA in vaccines, they can still get you with GMO food).  In fact, Regulators have discovered a hidden viral gene in commercial GMO crops: this article, you will learn that the GMO foods we have been exposed to for OVER TWENTY YEARS have multiple effects which are very dangerous and have NEVER BEEN SUBJECTED TO RISK ASSESSMENT. 

Documented evidence of the damage GMO crops are doing:

Seeds of Death documentary: and here

Do you think for one minute that these treasonous psychopaths who voted not to label these frakenfoods don't know all of this?  Of course they do but the cash that Monsanto is stuffing into their campaign coffers has caused them to sell their souls; to allow their constituents to be genocided.  Of course, it is not just the GMO's themselves, but also the herbicide Roundup that is sprayed on these crops causing tremendous damage to nature and all living things (especially bees needed to pollinate crops): This Reuters article tells us "heavy use of the world's most popular herbicide, Roundup, could be linked to a range of health problems and diseases, including Parkinson's, infertility and cancers, according to a new study. The peer-reviewed report, published last week in the scientific journal Entropy, said evidence indicates that residues of "glyphosate," the chief ingredient in Roundup weed killer, which is sprayed over millions of acres of crops, has been found in food." Please note that these pesticides cannot be washed off, as the plants get a chemical enema when the herbicides and pesticides go into the ground and are then soaked up through the roots of the plants.  You are eating POISON FOOD!

Moving on, you may remember the scandal regarding the compounding pharmacy in Massachusetts found responsible for an outbreak of fungal meningitis due to a steroid drug they were manufacturing to be injected into the spinal canals of patients:

When I heard about this, I realized immediately that this would be used as an excuse to bring down the hammer on ALL compounding pharmacies. In fact, I am sure that this happened on purpose so that the hammer could be brought down since, as a rule, these pharmacies mostly make preparations using natural substances (especially bioidentical hormones for women). Big pharma is out to eradicate all of its competition, aided and abetted by the traitors in the district of criminals.  Today I realized that I was rightagain , when I learned that Senator Tom Harkin of Iowa (who also voted NO to the labeling of GMO foods) has come up with S.959:

The Pharmaceutical Compounding Quality and Accountability Act:  This bill will give the FDA a hammer to destroy compounding pharmacists, allowing them to ban bioavailable hormones.  However, the toxic drugs sold by big pharma continue to kill hundreds of thousands of people every year and in the case of bioweapon vaccines, are even given immunity for their carnage.

A message to the military: THE TRAITORS ARE WITHIN!  How obvious can it be, people?

If you want to learn how "accountable care organizations" invented in Obamacare will take the white coats out of the process of deciding what will be covered by insurance, check out:

The white coats deserve what they are getting, as they have allowed the Hippocratic oath to become the hypocritic oath. Unfortunately, physician assistants and nurse practitioners will sell out their patients for a lower payout, so the killing and maiming will continue.  YOU ARE PAYING FOR YOUR OWN DEMISE.

Of course, the assault on children with bioweapon vaccines never ends.  Schools have become clinics of death and destruction:

If you really love your children, why aren't you homeschooling them to protect them?  It is getting worse every day, as the following article illustrates:


If you need help in reversing your disease with natural therapies. please go to to learn how Dr. Carley does consults.  (Note that Alzheimers can be reversed as long as there is family available to give the person their remedies).  You can access many archives of internet shows Dr. Carley has done over the last few years at

The information contained herein is not designed to diagnosis, treat, prevent or cure disease. Seek medical advice from a lincensed medical physician (if you dare) before using any product or therapy.

To unsubscribe to this email, reply and put "Unsubscribe" in the subject line.

Copyright 2012-13 Discount Gold & Silver Trading All rights reserved

Discount Gold and Silver Trading, PO Box 507, Port Matilda, PA 16870 • 1-800-375-4188