Discount Gold and Silver Trading

American Survival Newsletter:
Combining the World of Finance, Health & Politics

American Gold

A weekly newsletter brought to you by
Discount Gold & Silver 800-375-4188
Edited by Alfred Adask
Friday, December 14th, A.D. 2012

Between Friday, December 7th and Friday, December 14th, the bid prices for:

Gold fell 0.5 % from $1,704.50 to $1,696.20
Silver fell 2.4 % from $33.11 to $32.31
Platinum rose 0.6 % from $1,605 to $1,615
Palladium rose 0.6 % from $697 to $701
DJIA fell 0.1 % from 13,155.13 to 13,135.01
NASDAQ fell 0.2 % from 2,978.04 to 2,971.33
NYSE rose 0.2 % from 8,314.29 to 8,333.74
US Dollar Index fell 1.0 % from 80.41 to 79.56
Crude Oil rose 1.0 % from $86.00 to $86.86

Made in America “Made in America” coins are a great way to protect your wealth!

This week's special includes:

90% Silver Quarters or
Dimes pre-1965
$50 Face Value (approx. 17oz of silver)

90% silver coins are one of the most cost effective methods to purchase silver.  Known as “junk silver,” these 90% silver coins are often sold in bags and rolls, but are far from being “junk” as the name may imply.  With little to no collector value, 90% silver coins are worth the market price of the silver they contain.  But even if the market price of silver dropped to zero, the coins will always be worth their face value.

MS65 Morgan Silver Dollar

Morgan dollars are one of the most collected coins in the world! These coins have been independently authenticated and graded by PCGS . Each grades MS-65, which on the 70 point scale means these are in full gem condition. Coins of this grade were bringing $500 or more in the previous bull market. Dates are our choice but many are in the 1880's.

Total package--$50 face value "junk silver" plus MS65 Morgan Silver Dollar
Cost . . . $1400 (includes all shipping costs)

Call Discount Gold and Silver at
1 800 375 4188

For the best in pricing and service for gold and silver coins, call Melody at 1-800-375-4188

**Prices are subject to change based on market conditions and availability. This special can be removed for offer at anytime.

"Only buy something that you'd be perfectly happy to hold
if the market shut down for 10 years."—Warren Buffett

“What investment would you dare to hold 'blindly'
for 10 years—other than gold?”—Alfred Adask

Is Obama Eligible to be President?

by Alfred Adask

Curiously, between November 6th, A.D. 2012 (the date of our most recent presidential election) and January 21st, A.D. 2013 (the date of the next President’s inauguration), Barack H. Obama holds two offices.  He is both:

1) The President of the United States (serving from January, A.D. 2009 through January 20th, A.D. 2013); and,

2) The “President elect” (who will be inaugurated on January 21st, A.D. 2013 to begin his next, four year term of office as our next “President”.)

•  Article 2 Section 1 Clause 5 of The Constitution of the United States declares in part, “No Person except a natural born Citizen . . . shall be eligible to the office of President.” 

A lot of folks believe that Barack Obama was born in Kenya and is therefore not a “natural born citizen” and is therefore unqualified to be President.  I think they’re right. 

But, right or wrong, the 20th Amendment to the Constitution might help resolve the issue of Obama’s eligibility. 

The 20th Amendment to the Constitution was adopted on February 6th, A.D. 1933.  Section 3 of that Amendment declares that the “President elect” must be “qualified” before he can become the President:

“If, at the time fixed for the beginning of the term of the President, the President elect shall have died, the Vice President elect shall become President. If a President shall not have been chosen before the time fixed for the beginning of his term, or if the President elect shall have failed to qualify, then the Vice President elect shall act as President until a President shall have qualified; and the Congress may by law provide for the case wherein neither a President elect nor a Vice President elect shall have qualified, declaring who shall then act as President, or the manner in which one who is to act shall be selected, and such person shall act accordingly until a President or Vice President shall have qualified.”

Thus, merely winning the November 6th election does not make Mr. Obama our next President.  Even winning the Electoral College vote doesn’t guarantee that Mr. Obama will regain the White House.  Instead, according to the 20th Amendment, the President elect must satisfy some sort of additional qualification procedure before he can be inaugurated on January 21st.

Curiously, the 20th Amendment recognizes the possibility that Americans might someday be so damn ignorant that they mistakenly elect a man to be our next President who is technically ineligible to be President.  In theory, this ineligibility would be discovered during the “qualification” process that takes place after the election and before the inauguration.

For example, Americans could conceivably have voted to elect Vladimir Putin as our next President.  But given that Mr. Putin is already President of Russia, was born in Russia, and isn’t even a citizen of the United States, he’s not eligible to hold the office of President.  Nevertheless, he is eligible to become the President elect, even though he’s not eligible to become the President.  In other words, any fool can win the presidential election, but only someone who is properly qualified can be lawfully inaugurated into the office of President.

Presumably the qualification process referenced in the 20th Amendment would disclose that—OMG!—Mr. Putin is ineligible to be President and therefore the recently-elected Vice President would assume the office of President at the January 21st Inauguration.

The 20th Amendment clearly implies that there’s a 75-day period between the November election and the January inauguration when the President elect must be “qualified” by some authority as eligible to become the actual President.  But, insofar as the qualification process should be applied to the President elect, that constitutional qualification process is only mandated to take place after someone has been elected to later become the next President. This implies that, under the 20th Amendment, the government can’t enforce any qualification requirements on anyone running for President until after they’ve been elected.

This conjecture implies that anyone is eligible to run for President and no court may be competent to hear a challenge to any presidential candidate’s qualifications until after he’s become the President elect.  If so, then any challenge to a presidential candidate’s qualifications could not be lawfully heard by a court until after the candidate had become the President elect.  If anyone tried to challenge a presidential candidate’s eligibility in court prior to the election, the courts might be forced to dismiss the case for lack of jurisdiction.

Get that?  If my reading of the 20th Amendment is roughly correct, you couldn’t mount a successful court-room challenge to a presidential candidate’s eligibility to be President until after he had first been elected to the office of the President elect.  More, once the President elect was inaugurated to become the President, you might be again precluded for the remainder of his 4-year term of office from mounting an effective courtroom challenge to his qualifications.

Therefore, as crazy as it seems, under the 20th Amendment, the American people are absolutely entitled to elect Vladimir Putin to the office of “President elect”—but Mr. Putin would presumably be declared “unqualified” during the post-election, pre-inauguration “qualification” process.

In fact, if you wanted to make a really crazy illustration of this hypothesis, we could even elect some black guy from Kenya (hah!) to be the President elect.   But, presumably, if our black guy from Kenya was truly ineligible to hold the office of President, he would be disqualified by the pre-inauguration qualification process.

•  I don’t know what the pre-inauguration qualification procedure is.

I don’t know who must conduct that qualification procedure.

I don’t know what the pre-inauguration qualifications are.   I assume the qualifications include age, citizenship and place of birth.

The pre-inauguration qualification procedure might be conducted by the House of Representatives or the Senate—perhaps even by the Supreme Court.  It at least seems logical to assume that the qualification process would determine whether the President elect was, in fact, a “natural born Citizen” as required by Article 2, Section 1, Clause 5 of The Constitution of the United States.

It seems reasonable to assume that if the official entity responsible for conducting the pre-inauguration qualification procedure fails to do so, the members of that entity might be subject to a writ of mandamus to compel them to perform their duty to test the qualifications of the President elect.  In fact, if the members of the “qualification entity” failed or refused to perform their duty to qualify the President elect, they might be subject to personal liability for dereliction of duty, malfeasance or even treason.

•  My problem is that while the 20th Amendment clearly implicates some sort of qualification process, I have so far failed to find any law indicating what agency or authority conducts the qualification procedure, or what the qualifications are. 

Given that I ran for Place 1 of the Supreme Court of Texas in A.D. 1992, I’m not completely incompetent to perform legal research.  So, it seems strange that I’ve not yet found any law that identifies the qualification authority or specifies whatever qualifications must be met.

However, I have found 3 U.S.C. §19 which refers to the presidential qualification process nine times—but doesn’t tell us what authority conducts that process or what qualifications are required.  Thus, we appear to have a constitutional authority (20th Amendment) and a statutory authority (3 U.S.C. §19) for conducting a “qualification” process—but I can’t find anything to tell me who conducts that qualification process or what qualifications must be met.

Title 3 of the United States Codes is entitled “The president” (

Chapter 1 of Title 3 is entitled “Presidential elections and vacancies” (

Chapter 1 of Title 3 has 21 sections including Section 19 (3 U.S.C. §19) which is entitled “Vacancy in offices of both President and Vice President; officers eligible to act” ( 

Here’s part of 3 U.S.C. §19:


“(1) If, by reason of death, resignation, removal from office, inability, or failure to qualify, there is neither a President nor Vice President to discharge the powers and duties of the office of President, then the Speaker of the House of Representatives shall, upon his resignation as Speaker and as Representative in Congress, act as President. . . .
The man who “acts” as President may be a “de facto” President rather than a man who is a constitutionally-qualified, de jure President.
“(b) If, at the time when under subsection (a) of this section a Speaker is to begin the discharge of the powers and duties of the office of President, there is no Speaker, or the Speaker fails to qualify as Acting President, then the President pro tempore of the Senate shall, upon his resignation as President pro tempore and as Senator, act as President.”
Insofar as the Speaker of the House must also be “qualified” to become President but has not received any Electoral College votes to do so, Electoral College votes can’t be part of the “qualifications” to become President.  This implies that the Electoral College has nothing to do with determining whether a President elect is “qualified” to become President.  If so, then the authority able or charged with performing the qualification procedure should be either 1) the House of Representatives; 2) the Senate; or 3) the Supreme Court.
“(c) An individual acting as President under subsection (a) or subsection (b) of this section shall continue to act until the expiration of the then current Presidential term, except that -

“(1) if his discharge of the powers and duties of the office is founded in whole or in part on the failure of both the President-elect and the Vice-President-elect to qualify, then he shall act only until a President or Vice President qualifies;”
It’s hard to imagine the scenario represented by subsection (c)(1).  It appears that under this scenario, there was a qualified President who was removed by resignation, impeachment or death.  An Acting President was appointed to fill the office, but that Acting President would relinquish that office as soon as a new President or Vice President was qualified to hold the office. 

Note that this de facto, “Acting President” is not to be replaced at the end of his term by a newly-elected and qualified President or Vice President.  This de facto, “Acting President” is to be replaced during his term by an individual who somehow “qualifies” to be President in the midst of an existing term of office.

How can that be?  There’s no proviso for emergency presidential elections.  How can a man who wasn’t elected to the presidency somehow “qualify” to be President during an on-going presidential term and while there is an otherwise acceptable de facto President in office?

“(1) If, by reason of death, resignation, removal from office, inability, or failure to qualify, there is no President pro tempore to act as President under subsection (b) of this section, then the officer of the United States who is highest on the following list, and who is not under disability to discharge the powers and duties of the office of President shall act as President: Secretary of State, Secretary of the Treasury, Secretary of Defense, Attorney General, Secretary of the Interior, Secretary of Agriculture, Secretary of Commerce, Secretary of Labor, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, Secretary of Transportation, Secretary of Energy, Secretary of Education, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Secretary of Homeland Security.

“(2) An individual acting as President under this subsection shall continue so to do until the expiration of the then current Presidential term, but not after a qualified and prior-entitled individual is able to act, except that the removal of the disability of an individual higher on the list contained in paragraph (1) of this subsection or the ability to qualify on the part of an individual higher on such list shall not terminate his service.

. . . .

“(e) Subsections (a), (b), and (d) of this section shall apply only to such officers as are eligible to the office of President under the Constitution. Subsection (d) of this section shall apply only to officers appointed, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, prior to the time of the death, resignation, removal from office, inability, or failure to qualify, of the President pro tempore, and only to officers not under impeachment by the House of Representatives at the time the powers and duties of the office of President devolve upon them.”
The need to “qualify” applies to all of the other individuals on the “list” who hold public office but have not been elected to be (not merely “act as”) the President.  Before they become President, they, too, must first “qualify”.

This implies that the probable authority for “qualifying” the President elect is the House, Senate or Supreme Court.

Again, while 3 USC 19 refers to “qualify” at least nine times, I have still failed to discover what those qualifications are and who is responsible to determining whether a President elect is or is not “qualified”. 

I’ve only searched superficially, so my failure to learn more about presidential “qualifications” proves nothing.

But I begin to wonder if—despite the 20th Amendment’s apparent requirement for a qualification process—there are no statutory qualifications to become President.  Maybe there were statutory qualifications prior to A.D. 1933 (when the 20th Amendment was ratified), but—maybe—those qualifications have since been repealed as have any statutes telling us who is responsible for “qualifying” the President elect and how the qualification procedure takes place.

It’s more likely that the presidential “qualification” requirement was “created” by 20th Amendment in A.D. 1933, but Congress has so far failed to implement that “qualification” process with statutes.

As the King of Siam told Anna, “It is a puzzlement”.  Actually, it just might be evidence of a very interesting constitutional puzzlement.  I.e., it’s possible that the constitutional requirement found in the 20th Amendment (ratified A.D. 1933) may have never been statutorily implemented.   If so, as unlikely as it sounds, it’s conceivable that no President elect in my considerable lifetime has ever been properly “qualified” to hold the office of President.  

If so, we might wonder how many other “unqualified” Presidents (besides Obama) have occupied the White House. 

We might also wonder if there’s a way to sue in federal court to compel the Congress (or Senate or Supreme Court) to perform the constitutional duty of “qualifying” the President elect.

Be sure to listen to Financial Survival radio program live at and Short-wave radio 7.490 AND 9.880Mhz M-F 4:00PM ET. We broadcast in cities of Spokane KTAC 93.0 5-6pm Eastern, Metairie WVOG 600AM 3-4PM Eastern and Dallas KXBD 1480AM 4-5PM Eastern.

Discount Gold & Silver Trading Co. provides all forms of precious metals including gold, silver platinum and palladium whether you are buying or selling. Our inventory includes but not limited to the American Gold, Silver, Platinum Eagle and numismatic products including rare, investment and circulated coins. Silver dollars, silver bars, rounds are on hand for the silver investor. Foreign gold is also available. Call for information regarding your precious metal gold and silver IRA. Call 1-800-375-4188 or visit the Web site at or email us at:


Self Sufficiency

Plan for Redundancy

Once you have lived the survivalist life – boots on the ground, so to speak --  you come to a bedrock realization that certain things were never made to be used long-term. Unfortunately, many of the tools and devices we've become accustomed to using fall into this category.  Things like generators, electric well pumps, things that require propane gas, gasoline or diesel fuel are all on the road to becoming  your next big disappointment when you actually have lived this way for a while.   

In everything aeronautical, every device is  completely redundant.  That is, there are two of everything.  Two fuel pumps, two distributors, two sets of spark plugs, etc., so that in mid-flight, if one fails the second takes over seamlessly.  When you live the survivalist lifestyle, it's like being up in an airplane.  If something fails, you have to be prepared to have something to take over the job  – that you have primary systems and redundant fall-back systems.    

Aside from certain machines' inherent nature of being unreliable, no matter how much gas, diesel or propane you have stored, you're bound to run out at some time.  So we offer the following suggestions based upon our seven years experience and hard-learned lessons.

"I'm okay –  I've got a well, I've got a generator and I've got a heavy duty pump."  Well, of course, the weakest link in this chain is the generator itself, followed by the need for  gas.  In the last 7 years we've owned a dozen generators or more.  Admittedly, early on in this life we had a  lot of dependence on generators for building houses and such.  But that aside, even with  meticulous upkeep and maintenance, all generators have a finite amount of hours they will  live and when they go, they go hard, that is, usually  unrepairable.  We're not saying you shouldn't use a generator at all, but relying on it solely for getting water out of the ground is looking for disappointment. 

What would you give for water if an EMP knocks out your generator, or your electric well pump quits, or  you run out of gas, or your generator just stops working?  It would make your well a really expensive hole in the ground and not of much use.  Even if  you could get a bucket down there, how many times could you pull a bucket filled with water (at 11 pounds per gallon) up a few hundred feet with a rope?    We found an excellent way to have a redundant (or even sole and reliable) system .  It's called a Flojak deep well hand pump. So simple it's priceless.   Installation only takes a few hours, most of that time spent gluing PVC together.  With the PowerJak handle, it's easy to pump water out of deep well situations and releases you from the reliance on generators if you're off the grid, or from electricity if you are on the grid. No more dependence on gas, diesel or propane.  And you don't have to give up your electric pump until you really have to, because the Flojak fits into the well alongside your current electric pump, ready to take over when needed. 

We met up with an old mountain hermit last weekend, who lives a few miles from us.  No roads to get there, we took a nice brisk walk.  He told me a couple of years ago that he knew living this life I would lose weight and get washboard abs because being self-reliant usually means chopping  your own wood, pumping your own water, toting the wood back to the house and many other countless chores.  But the Flojak is so easy with the PowerJak handle, that I may gain some weight back!

Chain saws, like generators, I've owned plenty of.  Everything from McCullough to Stihl to Husqvarna, and being an old salt and having owned a few boats, most of them would make great anchors.  In keeping with the theme or redundancy, all machines that inevitably break down or need non-renewable resources (gas) need a redundancy plan as well.   Even if your chainsaw is still working and you still have gas, two-cycle oil, bar oil, a spare bar, a new chain, additional spark plug, etc., etc,, we found that a better way to go is a two-man saw. No stopping every few minutes to tighten the chain, or add oil, or re-fuel.  And all we hear as we are cutting is the sound of birds, a gentle breeze through the trees and the rhythmic back and forth of wood being cut by hand.  And all we smell is the pleasant aroma of pine or juniper. 

There is no shame in using the technology that sometimes brilliant people have created to make daily life just a bit easier.  But be prepared for the day when that technology is no longer usable and you still have to live on.

Dan and Sheila are the authors of Surviving Survivalism – How to Avoid Survivalism Culture Shock and hosts of the free podcast, Still Surviving with Dan and Sheila, both available at For information about their survival community, or for other questions, they can be reached at


Pasteurized Supplements
By Herbalist Wendy Wilson

If you are building a house your builder may use pressure-treated lumber. If you visit a dairy farm you may see cow milk processed and pasteurized. If you visit a distillery you may see moonshine being made. What does lumber, alcohol and milk have to do with dietary supplements? Some companies will use similar processes to make supplements. My question is, does the process help or hurt the final product?


Pressure-treated lumber was invented 70 years ago by Dr. Karl Wolman. He discovered that if he forced preserving chemicals into the wood at high pressure it would make the wood last longer and make it less attractive to termites. So, how did Wolman achieve this? He placed wood into a cylinder holding tank and depressurized it (removed all air). He filled the tank with the chemical preservatives and with high pressure forced the chemicals into the fiber of the wood. Then he drained the tank of unused chemicals and removed the wood. Pressure treated wood is more expensive because it resists fungus, boring insects and last approximately 20 years or more.


Pasteurized milk used high temperatures to kill bacteria and there are several ways to accomplish this;

• flash pasteurization uses high temps for about 15 seconds
• steam pasteurization is used to kill e-coli, salmonella and listeria often found in beef carcasses
• irradiation pasteurization uses gamma rays to hinder food-borne microbes from growing
• ultra-high pasteurization using heat of 280 to 302 degrees F for a few seconds

To kill salmonella you must heat to 180 degrees and e-Coli to over 160 degrees Fahrenheit for several minutes and therefore flash pasteurization and ultra-high pasteurization does not purify cow's milk.


Some supplements in the homeopathic realm are distilled offering an essence of the original ingredient. In the distillation method it separates mixtures and changes components within the mixture. In liquids for instance it will be heated to force components, which may have different boiling points, into a gas phase. The gas is then condensed back into a liquid form and collected. Repeating the process (double distillation) further separates components but is described as "purifying the properties." Many products are made by distillation such as; gasoline, distilled water (becomes mineral-free), alcohol, paraffin, kerosene and other products. Distillation is believed to first be used in the 1st century by Greek alchemists working in Alexandria . Distilled water is believed to have been made as early as 200 AD.  Egyptians used distillation extensively in their experimentation and the first book published on the subject was in 1500 was by a German alchemist and the book was titled The Art of Distillation by Hieronymus Brauschweig. Distillation is believed to have evolved from alchemy, which is a mix of science and witchcraft. Later alchemy evolved into what we now call science chemistry. All you have to do is look at vaccines laced with mercury (a favorite metal used in alchemy) to see this is fact.  


The competition is great in the supplement world. Not only do you have to stand out from your competitors but you also have to get a product quickly to your distributors to place the product in as many stores as possible. So, if your business makes herbal extracts (tinctures) how do you take herbs today, turn it into a tincture and have it on the truck for delivery tomorrow? You use forced-extraction processes similar to distillation and pressure treated lumber. These methods allow herb companies to skip the original but time-consuming aging process. A natural aging process allows the herb alkaloids to gradually permeate the liquid catalyst (usually alcohol) over a 30-day period. This process is similar to how wine is made. Unfortunately the time saved using forced extraction methods has a price. There is heat involved and this ruins the potency of the herb. You wind up with a weak formula. By weak I mean it will not work like it would with the entire nutrition the plant offered. It can also become a toxic formula and a few drops can cause allergic reactions.

"Your tinctures are worth the extra effort of international ordering. I enjoy your radio show as well. I listen to the show when I travel for work." Greg D. Saskatchewan, Canada


I've often spoke about the old ways of making herbal tinctures and how if made correctly they will have a long shelf life. It is not uncommon to discover tinctures that are 100-years-old and are still perfectly stable and useable. If you come across one call me before you open it. It would be like opening and tasting a bottle of wine brought up from the depths of the Titanic. It would curl your toes. The folks at Apothecary Herbs make herbal tinctures the old fashioned way with no heat, naturally age and cold press to preserve the potency. Nothing is fractionalized or removed from the plant alkaloids. You get what the Creator intended – full spectrum plant nutrition. Call Apothecary Herbs for their FREE product catalog toll free 866-229-3663, International 704-885-0277 online Apothecary Herbs sells their products direct so there is no middleman. This allows them to compete and still deliver a superior product. Call now and super-size your Pandemic Kit from the 1 oz to the  2 oz size formulas for just an extra $33.00. Take advantage of their 15% discount special now through December 21st with coupon code: CAPR12.  Have a safe and healthy holiday.

To receive your herb orders on time, please place your order by 2:00 pm EST December 21st. Apothecary Herbs is not shipping out orders the week of Christmas. Orders placed after 2:00 pm on 12/21/12 will ship after New Year's.

Herbalist Wendy Wilson on Herb Talk Live

Saturday morning show:
7 am EST on GCN
12/29/12 Dr. Rebecca Carley is guest-host for Wendy
Weekday show:
7 pm EST on AVR
12/18/12 Dr. Rebecca Carley is Wendy's guest
Shortwave show 8 pm EST WWCR 4840

Wendy says to check out for more information on healthy eating. Great health articles there on different topics. Tell them Herbalist Wendy Wilson sent you.

by Rebecca Carley, MD

There are many people exposing the multiple crimes against humanity being perpetrated all over the world by the psychopaths that control the world.  However, merely exposing the atrocities going on will do nothing to stop them, as everythingis under the control of these monsters.  In last week's newsletter (entitled "TRUTH IS NOW LABELED "HATE SPEECH"), I identified WHO the psychopaths are who control the world the "jews who are not jews" who identify themselves in their own jewish encyclopedia, 1925 edition, vol 5, p. 41 that "they are descendants of esau-edom" (

This means that they are descendants of the serpant; the "synagogue of satan" (as is referred to in the Bible at Revelation 2:9). Obviously, unless the enemies of humanity are identified, the multiple crimes against humanity they are perpetrating will never be stopped.  This bloodline is composed of psychopaths; those without a conscience.  They are killing us and destroying the planet.  If you have children, especially, you should be very concerned about the world that they will live in due to your inaction.  SILENCE IS CONSENT.  The good news is that there are many people standing up and telling the truth as to who the psychopaths are and what they are up to; people who know that the only hope for humanity is for a critical mass of we "goyim" to face reality.  A very excellent source of information can be found at Check out the many interviews involving those of us who have done our homework and speak the truth, refusing to allow this threat of "hate crimes" to stop us from warning humanity who the predators are.  In my newsletter last week, I used their own words and documentsto incriminate them.  I did receive a few death threats, but since I know we are all dead if these monsters are not stopped, the only thing these death threats accomplished was to reinforce that I am right over the target.  In the hope that many of you will stand up for humanity, it is important for you to know that as long as you use their own documents to incriminate them, there is nothing they can do.  Two very important legal definitions to consider are the definition of libel and slander:

Libel – 1 a : a written statement in which a plaintiff in certain courts sets forth the cause of action or the relief sought

a : a written or oral defamatory statement or representation that conveys anunjustly unfavorable impression  (This is the key; documentation of crimes against humanity negates the "unjust" label).

Slander – 1 : the utterance of false charges or misrepresentations which defame and damage another's reputation (if not false, there is no slander)

Over the past 2 weeks, I have re-interviewed an amazing woman, Deborah Tavares, who has been documenting multiple crimes against humanity being committed on Americans by agencies of our government (ergo, WE ARE PAYING FOR THESE CRIMES) using their own documents.  If you have the courage to face the truth, please go to   and listen to the archives of my shows with Deborah Tavares on 12/2/12 & 12/9/12.  I STRONGLY suggest you go to one of her most important websites,  and download some of the documents you can find at the "source documents" tab.  The "NASA:  Future of War" document is the one we spent most of our time discussing.  (If you want to learn what is actually happening now to create "super soldiers", I suggest you go to Although some claim that what Michael Prince reports is going on is a "hoax, everything he discusses is mentioned in the NASA document).  Who are they waging war against?  HUMANS.  Page 3 of this document lists the various agencies conspiring to transform humans into cyborgs.  On page 18, they describe "wearable/implantable (on-person) electronics – for sensory augmentation, health monitoring, and brain stimulation".  The insanity of implanting humans with nano robots to "monitor" their vital signs is the subject ot the book "The Creative Destruction of Medicine:  How the Digital Revolution will Create Better Health Care" by Eric Topol, MD.  He encourages his medical consumer readers to DEMAND that this transition occur.  Of course, the Wizard of OZ is one of the medical devils who endorses this book, stating in the foreward that "Smart patients will push the many stake-holders in health to accelerate change as medicine adapts to a new world of information and technology"  (If you want to see where we are headed, I strongly suggest you watch the movie "The Island" from 2005 (available from Netflix). 

On page 35 of the NASA document they discuss "Chew-Chew", a flesh/plant eating robot that hunts and digests flesh.  (Note that in July 2000 it was announced in Reuters out of London US scientists had developed a robot that runs off meat, named "Chew-Chew":  ).

On page 43 of the NASA document, they discuss "micro dust weaponry", where micro dust distributed in aerosols (i.e., chemtrails) is inhaled and bores into lung tissue to execute various "pathological missions".  They state that this is a LEGAL class of weaponry).

On page 52 it is mentioned that VITAMINS are one of many ways to distribute biological warfare agents.  Obviously the FDA is allowing this to happen.  Has the manufacturer of your vitamin supplements been bought out to be used to distribute biowarfare agents? This is a 114 page document check it out for yourself.  Putting your head in the sand will obviously NOT save you.  

In case you missed it (which is probable since it was not mentioned on any mainstream news source), on 12/4/12 the senate traitors in the district of criminals approved the fiscal year 2013 National Defense Authorization Act, which permits the president, (supported by nothing more substantial than his own belief that the subject poses a risk to national security) to deploy the US military to ARREST AN AMERICAN LIVING IN AMERICA and indefinitely detain them (just as is happening in Gitmo).  Check it out at  PLEASE NOTE that Senator Rand Paul (who voted yes on this bill)  appeared on Book TV on C Span on 12/9/12 to discuss his book "Government Bullies", in which he reveals that 41 US government agencies now have guns/swat teams, including the departments of Agriculture and Fish and Wildlife.  Is it not the pinnacle of hypocrisy for this man to write such a book and then vote "yes" on the NDAA?  HOW MUCH PROOF DO YOU NEED THAT OUR GOVERNMENT HAS BEEN TOTALLY

The information contained herein is not designed to diagnosis, treat, prevent or cure disease. Seek medical advice from a lincensed medical physician before using any product or therapy.

To unsubscribe to this email, reply and put "Unsubscribe" in the subject line.

Copyright 2012 Discount Gold & Silver Trading All rights reserved

Discount Gold and Silver Trading, PO Box 507, Port Matilda, PA 16870 • 1-800-375-4188